Monday 20 March 2017

Edinburgh's Precocious Children

Short lapse from Lenten discipline for this sad tale of Edinburgh life.

*Warning: Statutory rape discussion ahead.*

I first saw this story in a Scottish newspaper two days ago and was inspired by the shocking headline to read further. What I read made me feel extremely sorry for the Polish boy who--as I remarked to B.A.--was nevertheless in a state of mortal sin. Hopefully his parents have dragged him over the coals and sent him to confession.

It is interesting hat the judge did not mention "cultural issues", as is occasionally done. The sexual dissolution has made inroads in Poland, but I would be surprised to hear that parents there allow their twelve year old daughters to traipse about at night, talk to boys at taxi stands, and feel free enough to go with strangers to parties. Thus, I can well understand why, when these Edinburgh 12 and 13 year olds told a 19 year old Polish stranger that they were 16 and 17, he believed them.

The observations I can bring to the discussion is that I see any number of (I think--it's hard to tell) pre-teen girls on the Rough Bus wearing skin-tight leggings over their round bottoms and occasionally I shudder at a child's thick make-up. The make-up bothers me much more than their cheerful call-outs to strangers since this is Scotland and chatting happily with strangers is a time-honoured Scottish custom. However, it is a total contrast to life in Poland, where people do not smile at strangers, let alone strike up friendly conversations with them on the bus. In my experience, if an adult woman like me looks at a male stranger, he will know at once and stare back, thinking goodness knows what.

Hopefully this very sad story is at very least a warning to young men who come to Scotland that sometimes girls who act and look like and claim to be older girls are actually only 10 or 12. A commentator asked if boys should be expected to ask for ID, and my answer is "Yes."  Other commentators have echoed my grim thoughts about the girl's parents, but not only parents are to blame for the behaviour of twelve year olds. Pop culture has been selling sex to children for decades now, and local children eat up pop culture like ice-cream. When B.A. shushed a pair of noisy girls who were harassing two quiet girls on the Rough Bus, they began to sing some pop song they had down word-perfect.

I am not sure what this says about me, but the part of the story that had me tight-lipped with anger was the twelve-year-old's worrying to others that she might be pregnant. It was not enough that she had had a one night stand with a "fit" guy she met in a taxi queue---no, she had to have some DRA-MA. This, I tell myself, is unfair. She is, after all, only twelve. And presumably pregnancy worries are a natural and unpleasant part of pre-teen sex lives.

On the other hand, considering that her lust (but for what?) and lies led to a young man's name and photo being splashed across Britain's national newspapers, I do wonder how much slack we should cut a girl just because she's twelve. He's named; she's not. She lied. He didn't. She may have known what they were doing was against the law in Scotland. He didn't knowingly consent to having sex with a girl her age. (When he found out she was only 12, he burst into tears.) Nevertheless, headlines call him a rapist. She isn't called anything. So far any public anger I've seen is directed towards her (unnamed) parents.*

*Update: Well, Poles have something to say, (Roughly) e.g. " To zepsuta moralnie dziewczyna jest winna." (Roughly, "It [her behaviour] is morally wrong; the girl is guilty.") They are also fighting among each other about Queen Jadwiga and telling lurid stories about the behaviour of modern day teenage Polish girls. "World has gone to dogs," says one grumpy chap.

8 comments:

  1. I didn't read the article, as the only difference between this one and so many others is that the poor guy seems to have been truly naive and not "out for something." But your column reminded me of a time when one of our high school girls texted 6 of her very best friends that she'd seen a handsome 25 year old coach on our staff out at a public function, and that they'd gotten drunk and slept together. Naturally, all 6 girls forwarded the text to their very best friends, and the whole school had the story within minutes. The coach was immediately interrogated, and even though he had an alibi, he left the interrogation and went to throw up on the football field. The girl ultimately confessed that she'd fabricated the whole thing. But our principal didn't expel her, which I thought would have been too good for her. She had slandered him and done him tremendous harm, and because she was a minor, she could get away with it. We've all been young and exercised poor judgement, but some things should still be punishable, else how do we learn?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my goodness. The poor coach. The poor 25 year old coach! I am not sure what kind of punishment would fit her crime, although expulsion would certainly send her and everyone else a message.

      As for the Edinburgh chap, unless the twelve-year-old jumped him in the taxi (perfectly possible), it looks as if he WERE out for something, only not with a twelve year old!

      Delete
  2. What the heck is a 12 yo doing out in the small hours of the morning??? Is that normal in Scotland?

    Julia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It may be normal for some families, unfortunately. I am not sure when the "golden age" of strictly watched children was in Scotland, but there has been a fair amount of family breakdown since 1963.

      Delete
  3. I do think it should be a crime to falsely report something like that. As for the polish guy, he may have been out for something but the punishment does not fit the crime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In his case there was no crime, as he was misled into believing the 12 year old was 16, and it seems as if the judge and police also looked at the 12 year old and thought "Aye, alright." The person who called the police was the 12 year old's older sister; perhaps she doesn't see "16" when she looks at her sister and perhaps her sister didn't admit to her that she lied her little head off about her age. She may have looked 16, but clearly she had the judgement of a 12 year old.

      Delete
  4. good lord! so much sympathy for the grown man who raped a child, but none for the twelve year old child who was raped?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am deeply sympathetic to the then-teenager who had consensual sex with a girl who convinced him that she was sixteen because (1) he had been tricked into having sex under false pretenses and (2) then was dragged through the court system. The judge threw the case out as the girl had clearly tricked him--and yet this very declaration of innocence is what gained him worldwide notoriety as a "rapist".

      My sympathy is increased by the fact that he, like me, was not born here and therefore may not have dreamed that a 12 year old could look and act like a libidinous 16 year old, or that her parent(s) would give her the freedom to do so.

      I am not without sympathy for the 12 year old who enjoyed her one night stand and apparently only regretted it when she worried she might be pregnant. She was also in a state of mortal sin, and if Protestant (like approximately 83% of Scotland) will not avail herself of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Besides that, she very likely belongs to a sub-culture in which the greatest adventure imaginable is to have sex with a handsome stranger and go home the next morning in a taxi cab. This is an incredibly narrow and impoverished existence for an adult woman, never mind a pre-teen.

      Believe me, whenever I am harassed by a young member of what is delicately (and wrongly) called "the socially excluded", I remind myself of her/his probable fate, and it's a dreary yet chaotic one.

      As an aside, I wish the public had been able to see a photograph of this girl, so we could all see that justice had been done, i.e. that we could judge for ourselves if she looked 16 or not. Naturally this could never be, of course. It would set a terrible precedent and add to the hardships of real rape victims. I won't say that the girl did that with this frivolous suit, since the person who called the police was her sister. The phone call would have better been to Social Services, but perhaps the sister didn't know that.

      Delete